The Serendipitous Nature of the icc Trial Proceedings Risks the icc’s Credibility in: Justice Without Borders
This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Close this message

The Serendipitous Nature of the icc Trial Proceedings Risks the icc’s Credibility

in Justice Without Borders

Abstract

This chapter considers whether the ad hoc nature of icc trial proceedings risks undermining the icc’s credibility. The Rome Statute and the icc Rules of Procedure and Evidence have sufficient constructive ambiguity as to how trials should be conducted such that, depending on the serendipitous composition of the Trial Chamber, trials can be shaped in a more ‘adversarial’ or more ‘inquisitorial’ fashion. This malleability, which may have been the result of a diplomatic compromise, has resulted in ad hoc trial proceedings at the icc; no two trials are conducted in the same manner. Since the hallmarks of any good court are uniformity, predictability, and reliability in its proceedings, does this feature, which is unique to the icc, risk undermining the legitimacy of the icc’s judgments and, inexorably, the icc itself?

Justice Without Borders

Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Schomburg

Table of Contents

Index Card

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 202 187 18
Full Text Views 122 122 0
PDF Downloads 20 20 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

Related Content